論文紹介００１

台湾と中国本土では確かにありそうですね，多声性の違いが．どんな風な分析をしているのか，論文をみるのが楽しみです．

Monologic and Dialogic Styles of Argumentation: A Bakhtinian Analysis of Academic Debates between Mainland China and Taiwan

Argumentation, Volume 18, Number 3

Tzu-Hsiang Yu1 Contact Information and Wei-Chun Wen1
(1) Department of Speech Communication, Shih Hsin University, No.1, Lane 17, Sec.1, Mu-Cha Road, Taipei, 116, Taiwan

Abstract This study applies the concept of ldquoreported speechldquo advanced by the renowned Russian literary scholar Mikhail Bakhtin to compare the argumentative styles of Mainland China and Taiwan. These societies in question are considered by many scholars as sharing the same argumentative style. The study reports that the Mainland debaters more frequently than the Taiwanese debaters maintained the authenticity of the quotations cited from ancient Confucian sources, whereas Taiwanese debaters paraphrased more frequently. On the other hand, this difference cannot be found when debaters quoted from sources other than Ancient Confucians. The findings, according to Bakhtin, imply a contrast of ldquomonologicldquo and ldquodialogicldquo tendencies toward authority, which results in a style difference between Mainland and Taiwan argumentation.

argumentation - Bakhtin - China - debate - dialogue - monologue - reported speech - Taiwan